Texas Dentists for Medicaid Reform

NEW PHONE NUMBER
For more information call (512) 487-7584

  • Home
  • Issues
  • * Medicaid Difficulty Alert *
    • About the Medicaid Difficulty Alert
    • Alert Form
  • Articles
    • TDMR articles
    • Medicaid Media
    • Compliance Articles
  • Archive
    • The Facts About the Medicaid Orthodontic Scandal 2007 to 2012
    • Antoine Dental Case
    • HHSC-OIG Archive 2012 to 2014
      • TMHP
      • Harlingen Family Dentistry Case
        • Further HFD articles
      • OIG Never Returns Funds
      • Webinar March 19 2012
      • 2008 TMHP Audit by OIG
      • 2012 TMHP Audit by OIG
      • OIG Legislative Testimony
        • OIG Testimony March 19 2013
        • OIG Testimony February 13 2013
        • OIG Testimony February 4 2013
        • OIG Testimony January 30 2013
      • Jack Stick Arrest for DWI
    • Due Process Archive
      • Survey Results
      • Committees
        • Hearing Videos
      • TDMR Submission
      • HB 1536/SB 785
        • House Committee on Human Services
        • Written Testimony
        • Attorney Testimony Videos
        • Dental Provider Testimony Videos
      • SB 1803
        • Overview
        • Bill Moves to House
        • Public Testimony Videos
        • Passes House Committee
        • Bill Changed Before House Vote
        • SB 1803 Has Passed the House!
      • Other Proposed Bills
      • Due Process Legal Articles
      • Legislative Media
      • Media Archive
  • About
    • Dr. Juan D. Villarreal
    • Dr. Paul Dunn
    • Gregory Ewing
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Medicaid Reform News / IG Wants to Make It Easier to Place Payment Holds

IG Wants to Make It Easier to Place Payment Holds

December 7, 2016 By TDMR 1 Comment


There have been rumors flying by the last few weeks that Inspector General Stuart Bowen wants to make it easier to place “credible allegation of fraud” (CAF) payment holds against Medicaid providers. We had no idea that this was difficult at all for the state since MCNA seems able to do so without any problems.

However, we were directed to a recent public hearing and found it was true.

This past September 13 at a hearing before the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, IG Stuart Bowen testified (see video) that because of SB207 his office has had a tough time placing CAF payment holds against Medicaid providers.  In fact, he said it is a tool he hasn’t been able to use until recently and he wants to make it easier for him to use by changing the changes that SB207 made to government legislation.

SB207 is, of course, the Sunset review legislation that reformed the Office of Inspector General because of systemic abuses including the placement of CAF payment holds without apparently having the requisite scintilla of evidence that is necessary per federal law.

Testimony short and without specifics

Bowen’s testimony on the matter was short and he did not tell the committee as a whole or the attending public what exactly the problem was with the legislation.  He apparently has done this only in private conversations with the committee chair Sen. Charles Schwertner and committee member Sen. Lois Kolkhorst.

He simply told the whole committee and public that Texas has a “one-in-a-nation” standard now that other states do not have.

What did SB 207 do?

This statement caused us to look up the exact changes that SB 207 made in government legislation on placing CAF holds and attempt to find what Bowen finds so objectionable and hampers his job.  This is not a full legal review although we will seek this.

Because of SB 207,  Government Code 531.102, as of August 2016, that governs of the Office of Inspector General, now states:

(g)(2)  As authorized under state and federal law, and except as provided by Subdivisions (8) and (9), the office shall impose without prior notice a payment hold on claims for reimbursement submitted by a provider only to compel production of records, when requested by the state’s Medicaid fraud control unit, or on the determination that a credible allegation of fraud exists, subject to Subsections (l) and (m), as applicable.  The payment hold is a serious enforcement tool that the office imposes to mitigate ongoing financial risk to the state.  A payment hold imposed under this subdivision takes effect immediately.

So federal law, 42 CFR 455.23 (Code of Federal Regulations) is the following:

Suspension of payments in cases of fraud.
(a) Basis for suspension.

(1) The State Medicaid agency must suspend all Medicaid payments to a provider after the agency determines there is a credible allegation of fraud for which an investigation is pending under the Medicaid program against an individual or entity unless the agency has good cause to not suspend payments or to suspend payment only in part.

(2) The State Medicaid agency may suspend payments without first notifying the provider of its intention to suspend such payments.

(3) A provider may request, and must be granted, administrative review where State law so requires.

Credible allegation of fraud is usually defined as:

A credible allegation of fraud may be an allegation, which has been verified by the State, from any source, including but not limited to the following:
(1) Fraud hotline complaints.
(2) Claims data mining.
(3) Patterns identified through provider audits, civil false claims cases, and law enforcement investigations. Allegations are considered to be credible when they have indicia of reliability and the State Medicaid agency has reviewed all allegations, facts, and evidence carefully and acts judiciously on a case-by-case basis.

What makes Texas different?

So what makes Texas different?  Well, section 8 above is the same as federal regulation but section 9 is the following:

(9)  The office may not impose a payment hold on claims for reimbursement submitted by a provider for medically necessary services for which the provider has obtained prior authorization from the commission or a contractor of the commission unless the office has evidence that the provider has materially misrepresented documentation relating to those services.

Also, (l) and (m):

(l) The office shall employ a medical director who is a licensed physician under Subtitle B, Title 3, Occupations Code, and the rules adopted under that subtitle by the Texas Medical Board, and who preferably has significant knowledge of Medicaid. The medical director shall ensure that any investigative findings based on medical necessity or the quality of medical care have been reviewed by a qualified expert as described by the Texas Rules of Evidence before the office imposes a payment hold or seeks recoupment of an overpayment, damages, or penalties.

(m) The office shall employ a dental director who is a licensed dentist under Subtitle D, Title 3, Occupations Code, and the rules adopted under that subtitle by the State Board of Dental Examiners, and who preferably has significant knowledge of Medicaid. The dental director shall ensure that any investigative findings based on the necessity of dental services or the quality of dental care have been reviewed by a qualified expert as described by the Texas Rules of Evidence before the office imposes a payment hold or seeks recoupment of an overpayment, damages, or penalties.

So what makes Bowen’s job so tough is that he can’t place a payment hold on services that received prior authorization UNLESS he has material evidence that the provider misrepresented something.  That seems pretty fair.

Also, if the allegation is against a doctor or dentist, those allegations need to be reviewed by an expert to make sure the payment hold is valid.  Considering past actions by OIG and waste of administrative court time in the Nazari and Rhoden cases, this seems quite reasonable.

Asked for comment

We have sent a request to the IG for comment on this.

Our job is not to prevent the finding of fraud and those committing it, but to ensure there is due process for all providers.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Medicaid Reform News, Slider Tagged With: medicaid fraud, office of inspector general, stuart bowen, texas medicaid reform

Comments

  1. Glenn says

    December 7, 2016 at 1:03 pm

    Are we considered respectable health professional any longer?

    I felt comfortable and committed to my service when our earn dental license make us respectable dentist and was the only valid legal credential under control of our clinical practice, knowledge, and the professional relations with our patients . I was eager full of enthusiastic learning and practicing about every dental procedure only for the benefit of my patients . I admired my senior colleges about their knowledge , experience and skills which could be represented in such a good results in their patients treatment and that was my goal be like my senior colleges. And now day every thing has changed.To many third parties ( Insurances, vendors, staff training facilities . management care, etc., ), rules and regulations . New generation of practitioners conditioned , limited and with other expectations. Conclusion we have lost control of our profession and practices..

    My enthusiastic demeanor has gone low, third parties want my enthusiasm for them not for my patients. Now days every body want to tell me how to practice dentistry ,what can I do , when to do it and even how much money I should made .Worse make me no to charge for services agreed with the patients and already rendered .

    Now Medicaid add withholding payments and recoups for any services performed by agreed terms in advance ????? .Regulating their subjective patterns which could be any procedure routinely done as exams , prophylaxis, taking x-ray, OHI, preventive , restoration , sealants , ETC.Scrutiny in Medically necessity diagnosis and definition when a subjective means of diagnosis must used are allow with the practitioner clinical visual exam judgment. HMO experts Scrutiny accepted by presuming the used of accurate diagnosis means is possible disregarding the fact that the only could be done with expensive sophisticated technology means no affordable and no cover by Medicaid.

    To our patients the implementing Pre authorization will only delay treatments and is time consuming ( time is money).The Medicaid patient population is low income population and forcing them for having several appointments made patients health condition worse. In addition of the costs of several visits logistics for having patients for treatment that could be done in one visit. and what worse missing treatment for good.

    The name experts from where it comes from? how are they elected( finger point?) or why considered experts? from whom they get the title ????

    When must of these name experts persons are not better in clinical daily knowledge than any other license dentist practitioners investigated. What about when experts had the need to support them as experts. .It Is then when the expert will arbitrary misrepresent no applicable subjective aid diagnosis means for medically necessity conditions which do not need other than the clinical provider visual diagnostic evaluation as objective documentation for medically necessary conditions all for they own convenience. At that stage is when provider words confront against expert word and guess who will be consider right and who is going to judge that decision ??

    Are we dentist criminals after fraud?? I though I was a health provider.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search the TDMR Website

Most Viewed Posts & Pages

  • Fort Worth Doctor Sentenced to 10 Years in Health Care Fraud Conspiracy
    Fort Worth Doctor Sentenced to 10 Years in Health Care Fraud Conspiracy
  • Dental firm managers accused of health care fraud
    Dental firm managers accused of health care fraud
  • Spine surgeon gets 10-year prison sentence for healthcare fraud
    Spine surgeon gets 10-year prison sentence for healthcare fraud
  • Three companies receive Medicaid managed care dental contracts
    Three companies receive Medicaid managed care dental contracts
  • Judge Orders Dr. Richard Malouf to Pay Texas Back $12 Million for Medicaid Fraud
    Judge Orders Dr. Richard Malouf to Pay Texas Back $12 Million for Medicaid Fraud

Receive Updates on TDMR Activities

Recent Comments by Readers

  • mattthew on Texas Lawyers Behind Samson Dental Partners and ImmediaDent $5.1 million settlement in Indiana
  • Spence on Woman claims dentist pulled wrong tooth
  • Spence on Woman claims dentist pulled wrong tooth
  • Nilar Vargas on Dentists cleared to administer COVID-19 vaccine in California
  • TDMR on UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Angela on UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines

Recent Media of Interest

Dental firm managers accused of health care fraud

February 26, 2021

Spine surgeon gets 10-year prison sentence for healthcare fraud

February 26, 2021

Fort Worth Doctor Sentenced to 10 Years in Health Care Fraud Conspiracy

February 26, 2021

U.S. Attorney Scott Brady and Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro Announce Indictment in Nursing Home Investigation

February 25, 2021

AG Healey reaches settlement with Brighton dental office for failing to accept MassHealth patients

February 24, 2021

Feds: Father, son sentenced in $27M Obamacare scheme

February 24, 2021

Mhiramarc Exec Sentenced in $28 Million Hospice Fraud Scheme

February 22, 2021

HHS Acting Secretary Norris Cochran Declares Public Health Emergency for State of Texas Due to Winter Storms

February 19, 2021

President Biden Announces Key Members of his Health and Human Service, Education, and Veterans Affairs Teams

February 19, 2021

Feds sweeten Medicaid deal

February 19, 2021

Senior Care Company Agrees to Pay $714,996 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations

February 18, 2021

Three companies receive Medicaid managed care dental contracts

February 17, 2021

Medical equipment firm and its owner agree to pay $20.3M in fraud scheme

February 17, 2021

Biden’s Medicare Pick Would Be 1st Black Woman to Hold Post

February 17, 2021

15 years in prison for $154 million Medicare fraudster

February 15, 2021

Former top aides say Attorney General Ken Paxton received assistance with home remodel, job for alleged girlfriend in return for helping political donor

February 12, 2021

More Articles...

Copyright © 2021 · All Rights Reserved. Texas Dentists for Medicaid Reform · Privacy Policy