Texas Dentists for Medicaid Reform

NEW PHONE NUMBER
For more information call (512) 487-7584

  • Home
  • Issues
  • * Medicaid Difficulty Alert *
    • About the Medicaid Difficulty Alert
    • Alert Form
  • Articles
    • TDMR articles
    • Medicaid Media
    • Compliance Articles
  • Archive
    • The Facts About the Medicaid Orthodontic Scandal 2007 to 2012
    • Antoine Dental Case
    • HHSC-OIG Archive 2012 to 2014
      • TMHP
      • Harlingen Family Dentistry Case
        • Further HFD articles
      • OIG Never Returns Funds
      • Webinar March 19 2012
      • 2008 TMHP Audit by OIG
      • 2012 TMHP Audit by OIG
      • OIG Legislative Testimony
        • OIG Testimony March 19 2013
        • OIG Testimony February 13 2013
        • OIG Testimony February 4 2013
        • OIG Testimony January 30 2013
      • Jack Stick Arrest for DWI
    • Due Process Archive
      • Survey Results
      • Committees
        • Hearing Videos
      • TDMR Submission
      • HB 1536/SB 785
        • House Committee on Human Services
        • Written Testimony
        • Attorney Testimony Videos
        • Dental Provider Testimony Videos
      • SB 1803
        • Overview
        • Bill Moves to House
        • Public Testimony Videos
        • Passes House Committee
        • Bill Changed Before House Vote
        • SB 1803 Has Passed the House!
      • Other Proposed Bills
      • Due Process Legal Articles
      • Legislative Media
      • Media Archive
  • About
    • Dr. Juan D. Villarreal
    • Dr. Paul Dunn
    • Gregory Ewing
  • Contact

Fread Houston

I’d like to thank the Chair and the Committee for the opportunity to speak in favor of HB 1536. My name is Fread Houston of Austin, Texas. I formerly served as the Director of Sanctions for the HHSC Office of Inspector General (OIG) from January 2009 to May 2012. Among other duties it was the responsibility of the Sanctions Division to review and prosecute cases received from the OIG investigators and to initiate payment holds.

The fact that the OIG has a responsibility to reduce fraud, waste and abuse in the Medicaid program is beyond question, however the enforcement approach of any agency should be competent, ethical, in accord with due process and have an awareness and sensitivity to the program’s purpose and intent. To be clear, the OIG has a dedicated staff that works hard to carry out the policies set by the agency’s management. The current OIG management has charted a more aggressive stance in seeking to recoup dollars. However, this aggressive enforcement stance is not supported by a focus on the fundamentals of adequately developing a case but instead it relies upon a process heavily driven by potential collection amounts and novel reinterpretations of policy instead of evidence and proper enforcement of the Medicaid rules. While I was at the OIG I encountered a number of concerns regarding the agency’s processes:

There were concerns about the process of retaining experts who had little to no experience with the Medicaid program and the use of those experts to reliably interpret Medicaid policy.

I received expert reports that were unsigned by the expert. I was told that expert reports were edited by Enforcement management to remove statements that were supportive of a provider’s actions.

Normal intake processes for reviewing cases for legal and evidentiary sufficiency and for the determination to initiate prosecution were effectively removed from attorneys in the Sanctions Division who are legally and professionally responsible for those prosecutions, such that it resided almost solely in the discretion of the Deputy of Enforcement (DOE), who directly oversees the Medicaid Program Integrity (MPI) Division which is responsible for initiating and conducting investigations on providers.

Once the Sanctions case intake process was overturned in fact, payment hold cases were transferred directly to Sanctions under the credible allegation of fraud process and a payment hold was mandated to be put in place immediately. Under the orthodontic initiative, the agency retroactively applied a new Medicaid policy interpretation regarding ectopic eruptions and declared past orthodontic treatment to be fraud or willful misrepresentation under the new credible allegation of fraud mandate. This strategy would allow the agency to impose 100% payment holds on Medicaid practices based upon a reinterpretation of policy with no evidence of actual fraud. Despite recent claims by OIG management made to the Legislature of an extensive case vetting process, any questioning of the evidentiary sufficiency of a case by legal staff was met with swift disapproval from the IG, the DOE and the Chief Counsel. The discretion to consider any good cause exception including financial burden was limited to the IG’s personal discretion instead of being based upon the recommendation of the Sanctions Division Accountants who would typically perform an independent review of the provider’s financials.

The actual evidentiary case itself could take years to complete investigation and even a payment hold hearing could take 8 months or more before a decision is issued and the payment hold remains in place during that time. This process could easily destroy a medical or dental practice in a short amount of time if it treats a significant amount of Medicaid patients.

As an alternative a provider could request an informal conference. These conferences were normally conducted by Sanctions Division attorneys, however the policy was changed so that an informal conference could not be held without the attendance of the DOE. That quickly progressed to having the DOE actively heading the informal conference. The informal conferences focused heavily on the agency’s demand for payment as articulated by the DOE and very little discussion of the evidentiary merits of the case itself. Due to the high error rates determined by the new policy reinterpretation and the process of extrapolating the resulting dollar amounts, the overpayments typically ran into the millions of dollars.

In the sole OIG CAF payment hold case to complete the contested case process, the administrative law judge of the State Office of Administrative Hearings found insufficient evidence of fraud or willful misrepresentation by the provider. When the SOAH judge’s proposal for decision was returned to the HHSC’s administrative law judge who was delegated the responsibility of entering a final order for cases referred to SOAH under current rules, the HHSC judge entered the final order as required. However, the OIG challenged the HHSC judge’s entry of the final order in an attempt to overturn the findings of the SOAH judge who actually heard the case. The final order was inexplicably put on hold for months until the final decision was once again affirmed. The HHSC judge then retired from the HHSC. This has lead to concern as to the independence of the HHSC judges and the HHSC contested case process. An independent and fair contested case process is essential to constitutional due process and is the very reason why the State Office of Administrative Hearings was formed. I believe those concerns are valid and applicable to the enforcement of OIG contested cases and that the best route for protection of due process rights and a fair and impartial hearing would be to give providers the right to have their cases heard by the State Office of Administrative Hearings.

Also, in order to ensure fairness throughout the process, I also believe that it may be necessary to consider having a panel of independent experts review Medicaid cases after the investigative process and before the initiation of prosecution to ensure proper sufficiency of the cases.

HB 1536 will help to ensure a that the OIG can continue its duty to investigate fraud, waste and
abuse while also ensuring providers that the enforcement process will be fair and impartial and protect due process rights.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Search the TDMR Website

Most Viewed Posts & Pages

  • UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
    UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Judge Orders Dr. Richard Malouf to Pay Texas Back $12 Million for Medicaid Fraud
    Judge Orders Dr. Richard Malouf to Pay Texas Back $12 Million for Medicaid Fraud
  • Xerox/Conduent Settling Its $2 Billion Dental Medicaid Fraud Case with Texas?
    Xerox/Conduent Settling Its $2 Billion Dental Medicaid Fraud Case with Texas?
  • MB2 Dental Solutions Issues Statement About $8.45 Million Settlement
    MB2 Dental Solutions Issues Statement About $8.45 Million Settlement
  • TDMR DMO Survey 2018 Results: MCNA Improves, DentaQuest Has More Problems, Dentists Frustrated
    TDMR DMO Survey 2018 Results: MCNA Improves, DentaQuest Has More Problems, Dentists Frustrated

Receive Updates on TDMR Activities

Recent Comments by Readers

  • Spence on Woman claims dentist pulled wrong tooth
  • Spence on Woman claims dentist pulled wrong tooth
  • Nilar Vargas on Dentists cleared to administer COVID-19 vaccine in California
  • TDMR on UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Angela on UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Marjaneh on UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines

Recent Media of Interest

AG Pax­ton: OAG Recov­ered $1.2 Bil­lion for Texas Taxpayers

January 23, 2021

2 defendants plead guilty in $109M Medicare fraud case

January 22, 2021

Allstate Hospice Founders Settle Fraud Case for $1.8 Million

January 21, 2021

No pardon for Texas attorney general in last-minute list

January 20, 2021

Woman claims dentist pulled wrong tooth

January 16, 2021

Compounding Pharmacy Mogul Sentenced for Multimillion-Dollar Health Care Fraud Scheme

January 16, 2021

Man Charged with $5 Million COVID-Relief Fraud

January 16, 2021

Justice Department Recovers Over $2.2 Billion from False Claims Act Cases in Fiscal Year 2020

January 14, 2021

Longview clinic agrees to pay more than $330,000 in Medicare fraud case

January 12, 2021

Texas legislature opens amid ongoing pandemic, political unrest

January 12, 2021

Latest TSDBE Newsletter

January 11, 2021

Dental workers anxiously wait for COVID-19 vaccine

January 8, 2021

Dentists cleared to administer COVID-19 vaccine in California

January 6, 2021

Stanford Healthcare Loses in Appeals Court, Accused of Alleged $468 Million Dollar Healthcare Billing Fraud

January 5, 2021

CEO of inpatient treatment center admits to Medicaid billing fraud

January 5, 2021

Despite what dentists may be hearing, now is a great time to buy a practice

January 4, 2021

More Articles...

Copyright © 2021 · All Rights Reserved. Texas Dentists for Medicaid Reform · Privacy Policy