Texas Dentists for Medicaid Reform

NEW PHONE NUMBER
For more information call (512) 487-7584

  • Home
  • Issues
  • * Medicaid Difficulty Alert *
    • About the Medicaid Difficulty Alert
    • Alert Form
  • Articles
    • TDMR articles
    • Medicaid Media
    • Compliance Articles
  • Archive
    • The Facts About the Medicaid Orthodontic Scandal 2007 to 2012
    • Antoine Dental Case
    • HHSC-OIG Archive 2012 to 2014
      • TMHP
      • Harlingen Family Dentistry Case
        • Further HFD articles
      • OIG Never Returns Funds
      • Webinar March 19 2012
      • 2008 TMHP Audit by OIG
      • 2012 TMHP Audit by OIG
      • OIG Legislative Testimony
        • OIG Testimony March 19 2013
        • OIG Testimony February 13 2013
        • OIG Testimony February 4 2013
        • OIG Testimony January 30 2013
      • Jack Stick Arrest for DWI
    • Due Process Archive
      • Survey Results
      • Committees
        • Hearing Videos
      • TDMR Submission
      • HB 1536/SB 785
        • House Committee on Human Services
        • Written Testimony
        • Attorney Testimony Videos
        • Dental Provider Testimony Videos
      • SB 1803
        • Overview
        • Bill Moves to House
        • Public Testimony Videos
        • Passes House Committee
        • Bill Changed Before House Vote
        • SB 1803 Has Passed the House!
      • Other Proposed Bills
      • Due Process Legal Articles
      • Legislative Media
      • Media Archive
  • About
    • Dr. Juan D. Villarreal
    • Dr. Paul Dunn
    • Gregory Ewing
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Antoine Dental / Antoine Dental and HFD File Motion to Unseal Ellis Qui Tam Suit

Antoine Dental and HFD File Motion to Unseal Ellis Qui Tam Suit

July 21, 2013 By TDMR

Court roomLast week, Antoine Dental Centers of Houston and Harlingen Family Dentistry of Harlingen brought a motion before the Travis County District Court to unseal the massive Christine Ellis qui tam suit filing that in redacted form appears to have 46 pages of defendants. Lawyers for the plaintiff, Tony Canales and Jason Ray, brought the motion as the full qui tam filing is needed for the defense of their clients. A PDF of the file is available for download.

From the filing:

Summary
Upon information and belief, the above named parties believe that they are actually undisclosed defendants in this unsealed Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act (“TMFPA”) lawsuit. Both Harlingen Family Dentistry (‘HFD”) and Antoine Dental Center (“ADC”) are the subject of completed administrative payment hold hearings at SOAR The State and the Relator are not permitted to maintain a TMFPA complaint under seal once the purposes sought to be achieved by the sealing have evaporated.'” Having already brought administrative charges against HFD and ADC, there is no legitimate reason for the case to remain under seal.

Background
A. Events prior to this ease being partially unsealed.
This is a qui tam lawsuit, filed pursuant to TEX. HUM. RES. CODE § 36.102 et seq. (The Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act, or “TMFPA”). It was filed under seal on April 24, 2012 by Dr. Christine Ellis (also referred to as the “Relator”). One month later, on June 25, 2012, the State of Texas intervened and joined the lawsuit. Because it was filed under seal, no Defendants were served with the lawsuit and no Defendant was informed that it had been sued. Apparently, the relator and the State of Texas have persuaded this Court that the case should remain under seal for over a year. The case generally involves allegations of fraud and misrepresentations by Medicaid dental providers.
Meanwhile, the State, through the Texas Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General (HHSC-OIG), has been pursuing separate administrative sanctions/remedies against HFD and ADC.

On or about September 2011, the OIG instituted an administrative “payment hold” against HFD. A payment hold temporarily freezes future Medicaid payments to a provider, despite the provider’s ongoing participation in the Medicaid program. The payment hold against HFD was issued pursuant to what the OIG called a “credible allegation of fraud” regarding HFD’s past Medicaid billings. HFD requested an expedited administrative hearing limited to determining whether the State had a credible allegation of fraud, and if so, what level of payment hold, if any, was justified on the facts. The payment hold hearing was held at the State Office of Administrative Hearings on April 24-25, 2012—the same day that this TMFPA case was filed by the relator. On August 15, 2012, an administrative law judge found that the HHSC-OIG had no evidence that was “credible, reliable, or verifying, or that has indicia of reliability, that I-IFD committed fraud or misrepresentation.” That proposal for decision was adopted in full by the HHSC and became final on February 6, 2013.2

On or about April 4, 2012, the 010 instituted a “payment bold” against ADC; the payment hold against ADC was issued pursuant to what the OIG called a “credible allegation of fraud” regarding ADC’s past Medicaid billings. ADC requested an expedited hearing limited to determining whether the State had a credible allegation of fraud, and if so, what level of payment hold, if any, was justified on the facts. The administrative hearing was set for May 28, 2013. Three weeks before that hearing, in a move that appeared highly unusual at the time, the HHSC¬OIG sought and received approval from the Attorney General to retain outside counsel to prosecute the administrative case.3 The outside counsel in the ADC ease was Dan Hargrove (and his law firm) and Jim Moriarty (and his law firm).4 The ADC payment hold hearing was held at the State Office of Administrative Hearings on May 28-31, 2013. Final written closing arguments will probably be submitted within the next 45 days.

B. This lawsuit is now partially unsealed as to two defendants, but not HFD or ADC.
On June 6, 2013, this Court considered and granted what was misleadingly titled as an “Agreed Motion to Partially Unseal” the petition as to one of the Defendants. That Defendant is “M&M Orthodontics, Diana T. Malone, DDS, et al.” (the “Malone Defendants”). As a result of that order, a heavily redacted copy of the petition was provided to the Malone Defendants’ counsel. No other defendants in this case were unsealed or notified of the case, but it is clear from the 125 page petition (which includes 46 pages of redacted defendant names), that the Relator and State have chosen to bring their claims against many, many dental providers. The timing of the partial unsealing of this lawsuit as to the Malone Defendants is now obvious—the Malone Defendants are set to proceed to an administrative adjudication claims in the next 60 days.

The order partially unsealing the lawsuit as to the Malone Defendants expressly permitted the State and the Relator to pursue their claims in this lawsuit through the pending administrative hearing. The attorneys that filed this civil TMFPA ease on behalf of the Relator are Dan Hargrove and Jim Moriarty—the same attorneys that substituted late into the ADC administrative ease as outside counsel.

On June 18, 2013, this Court considered and granted a second misleadingly titled “Agreed Motion to Partially Unseal,” but this time as to another set of Defendants (collectively referred to as the “National Defendants.”). The National Defendants are set for an administrative hearing on August 19, 2013. Again, this court’s order partially unsealing the lawsuit as to the National Defendants expressly permitted the State and the Relator to pursue their TMFPA claims in this lawsuit through the pending administrative hearing. However, unlike the Malone Defendants, the National Defendants have never received a redacted copy of the petition that actually reveals that they are actually Defendants in this lawsuit.

In response to the June 6, 2013 Order Unsealing the Petition on the Malone Defendants, on July 19, 2013 the Malone Defendants filed in this court a document titled “Malone Defendants” Motion to Vacate. In an attempt to prevent this court from reviewing its earlier orders or determining whether the Relator was barred from bringing this suit in any forum, the State filed a June 24, 2013 Notice of Nonsuit as to the TMFPA claims against the Malone Defendants and the National Defendants in this case. Subsequently, the State filed at SOAH a notice of its intent to pursue its TMPFA claims in that administrative forum as to both the Malone Defendants and National Defendants.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: Antoine Dental, Harlingen Family Dentistry, Medicaid Reform News Tagged With: medicaid fraud, office of inspector general, texas medicaid reform, texas qui tam lawyers

Search the TDMR Website

Most Viewed Posts & Pages

  • UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
    UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Judge Orders Dr. Richard Malouf to Pay Texas Back $12 Million for Medicaid Fraud
    Judge Orders Dr. Richard Malouf to Pay Texas Back $12 Million for Medicaid Fraud
  • TDMR DMO Survey 2018 Results: MCNA Improves, DentaQuest Has More Problems, Dentists Frustrated
    TDMR DMO Survey 2018 Results: MCNA Improves, DentaQuest Has More Problems, Dentists Frustrated
  • MB2 Dental Solutions Issues Statement About $8.45 Million Settlement
    MB2 Dental Solutions Issues Statement About $8.45 Million Settlement
  • Xerox/Conduent Settling Its $2 Billion Dental Medicaid Fraud Case with Texas?
    Xerox/Conduent Settling Its $2 Billion Dental Medicaid Fraud Case with Texas?

Receive Updates on TDMR Activities

Recent Comments by Readers

  • Spence on Woman claims dentist pulled wrong tooth
  • Spence on Woman claims dentist pulled wrong tooth
  • Nilar Vargas on Dentists cleared to administer COVID-19 vaccine in California
  • TDMR on UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Angela on UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Marjaneh on UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines

Recent Media of Interest

AG Pax­ton: OAG Recov­ered $1.2 Bil­lion for Texas Taxpayers

January 23, 2021

2 defendants plead guilty in $109M Medicare fraud case

January 22, 2021

Allstate Hospice Founders Settle Fraud Case for $1.8 Million

January 21, 2021

No pardon for Texas attorney general in last-minute list

January 20, 2021

Woman claims dentist pulled wrong tooth

January 16, 2021

Compounding Pharmacy Mogul Sentenced for Multimillion-Dollar Health Care Fraud Scheme

January 16, 2021

Man Charged with $5 Million COVID-Relief Fraud

January 16, 2021

Justice Department Recovers Over $2.2 Billion from False Claims Act Cases in Fiscal Year 2020

January 14, 2021

Longview clinic agrees to pay more than $330,000 in Medicare fraud case

January 12, 2021

Texas legislature opens amid ongoing pandemic, political unrest

January 12, 2021

Latest TSDBE Newsletter

January 11, 2021

Dental workers anxiously wait for COVID-19 vaccine

January 8, 2021

Dentists cleared to administer COVID-19 vaccine in California

January 6, 2021

Stanford Healthcare Loses in Appeals Court, Accused of Alleged $468 Million Dollar Healthcare Billing Fraud

January 5, 2021

CEO of inpatient treatment center admits to Medicaid billing fraud

January 5, 2021

Despite what dentists may be hearing, now is a great time to buy a practice

January 4, 2021

More Articles...

Copyright © 2021 · All Rights Reserved. Texas Dentists for Medicaid Reform · Privacy Policy