Texas Dentists for Medicaid Reform

NEW PHONE NUMBER
For more information call (512) 487-7584

  • Home
  • Issues
  • * Medicaid Difficulty Alert *
    • About the Medicaid Difficulty Alert
    • Alert Form
  • Articles
    • TDMR articles
    • Medicaid Media
    • Compliance Articles
  • Archive
    • The Facts About the Medicaid Orthodontic Scandal 2007 to 2012
    • Antoine Dental Case
    • HHSC-OIG Archive 2012 to 2014
      • TMHP
      • Harlingen Family Dentistry Case
        • Further HFD articles
      • OIG Never Returns Funds
      • Webinar March 19 2012
      • 2008 TMHP Audit by OIG
      • 2012 TMHP Audit by OIG
      • OIG Legislative Testimony
        • OIG Testimony March 19 2013
        • OIG Testimony February 13 2013
        • OIG Testimony February 4 2013
        • OIG Testimony January 30 2013
      • Jack Stick Arrest for DWI
    • Due Process Archive
      • Survey Results
      • Committees
        • Hearing Videos
      • TDMR Submission
      • HB 1536/SB 785
        • House Committee on Human Services
        • Written Testimony
        • Attorney Testimony Videos
        • Dental Provider Testimony Videos
      • SB 1803
        • Overview
        • Bill Moves to House
        • Public Testimony Videos
        • Passes House Committee
        • Bill Changed Before House Vote
        • SB 1803 Has Passed the House!
      • Other Proposed Bills
      • Due Process Legal Articles
      • Legislative Media
      • Media Archive
  • About
    • Dr. Juan D. Villarreal
    • Dr. Paul Dunn
    • Gregory Ewing
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Medicaid Reform News / TDMR DMO Survey 2018 Results: MCNA Improves, DentaQuest Has More Problems, Dentists Frustrated

TDMR DMO Survey 2018 Results: MCNA Improves, DentaQuest Has More Problems, Dentists Frustrated

July 26, 2018 By TDMR 7 Comments

We have closed our revised 2018 Dental Management Organization annual survey and are today giving you the results.  Our survey sample is not that large, unfortunately.  At the end of the day, only 39 providers entered the survey as we decided to ask for actual names and provider numbers to prevent possible false responses.  Consequently, it is more than likely that those providers with problems took the time to answer the survey than those that had few or none.  Please keep in mind this is a casual survey and not in any way scientific.

That being said, the results seem to reflect the reality of the current situation for dental Medicaid providers.

Results changed from 2017

Our last survey done in 2017 showed that dental providers were dissatisfied with both DentaQuest and MCNA but more so with MCNA.  After all, MCNA had been placing payment holds on providers which they had no authority to do.  For 2018, while the number of providers still thinking MCNA is “terrible” remains higher than DentaQuest, it is significantly less than last year.  The majority of providers have “lots of difficulties still encountered” with MCNA and the number of those for DentaQuest has increased significantly.

A good note is that there was a slight rise for both companies in those providers finding “there was some improvement but still not satisfied” over last year.

Problems still abound

The problems that providers reported having with each company have changed somewhat.

With MCNA in 2017, the largest reported problem was “not approving medically necessary treatment.”  Thankfully, that concern has dropped significantly this year.  It has been replaced by “dictating treatment against my judgment.” which was also reported as significant in 2017.  The second largest reported problem in 2018 with MCNA is “credentialing takes a long time.”

DentaQuest’s largest reported problem in 2017 was “dental homes keep switching.”   For 2018, this is still the second most important problem encountered with the company.  However, concerns about the company “dictating treatment against my judgment” have grown significantly over the past year to become the number one problem encountered.

As far as the severity of these problems is concerned, both providers still have “multiple minor issues that don’t get resolved and keep recurring” as the most popular response.  For MCNA, the second most popular answer still is “a serious issue(s) that I cannot get resolved and is still outstanding.”  DentaQuest has “multiple minor issues that don’t get resolved and keep recurring” as the second most popular response which increased significantly from the year before.   More importantly, the number of respondents reporting “no problems at all” with DentaQuest dropped drastically from 2017 to 2018 from 24% to 4%.

A significant number don’t want a new DMO in Texas

As the RFP for the Medicaid dental contract has now gone out, it is significant that 35% of those responding did not want to see a third DMO in Texas.  From conversations with providers, it appears that for some the anticipated complications and probable administrative difficulties in accommodating a third company into the market out-weighs any possible benefit they might receive.

Majority providers report being “frustrated”

When asked about their attitude as a Medicaid provider, there is a definite difference from 2017.  While no one reported being “very happy” in 2018, the level of satisfaction grew by roughly 10% from the previous year.   Perhaps the almost 10% who reported being “very happy” in 2017 have downgraded to “satisfied.” The most popular response this year was “frustrated,” replacing “worried” as the number one answer.  Those “very upset” have also grown by 10% from the year before.  Those “on the verge of quitting” went up by 5%.

Again, our sample may be skewed towards dissatisfaction as stated above.

There you have it, our 2018 survey results.  You can review and download these below.

DMO_Survey 2018

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: DMO Surveys, Medicaid Reform News, Slider Tagged With: dentaquest, MCNA, Medicaid managed care, texas health and human services commission, texas medicaid reform

Comments

  1. Andrew Seamans DDS says

    July 26, 2018 at 10:31 pm

    DentaQuest has changed the time from 12 months to 36 months that they will pay for same tooth restoration by same dentist.

    Reply
    • Dentist says

      July 27, 2018 at 4:57 pm

      The policy in full states:

      replacement of an identical restorative service in less than 36 months by the same office is not considered the standard of care for quality by DentaQuest. Ifthere are special circumstances requiring this repeat service, please send in a prior authorization request along with a narrative establishing medical necessity.

      Reply
      • Ts says

        September 5, 2018 at 11:10 am

        They also denied a prior authorization for a filling on the same tooth but a different surface. Original treatment MO then 1 year later there was decay on distal and I requested payment for an MOD with a narrative and it was still denied because of the above rule. I called to explain it was a different surface and new decay and I was read the policy like I was a child that did not understand. So do I treat the patient using time, energy and money for free or leave the decay?

        Reply
  2. Glenn says

    July 31, 2018 at 4:30 pm

    HMO are there to delay and to denied . So the budget will not exceed Medicaid federal allowances.

    This HMO do not care about patients just to keep their contracts and fill their pockets with $$ at providers work no paid treatments.

    Reply
  3. Lynn P says

    September 18, 2019 at 12:52 pm

    Dentaquest is a lot worse in the last one year. Did a lot marketing and somewhat incentives but add a lot of paperwork to delay the treatment. Leaving the kids hurt. Be aware that also take the cases they already paid back so you work for free. Way to save money, well, I hope not for bonus.

    Reply
  4. Mary says

    March 6, 2020 at 1:10 pm

    Dentaquest refuses to do a build up on a tooth that already had a cap. Even though it was caused by the dentist who did not put the cap on correctly in the first place.

    Reply
    • Dr G says

      June 16, 2020 at 7:14 am

      Don’t bother billing building build ups, permanent crowns, or even 3 surface fillings. Why? they pay 50 bucks and you can get 100 or so if you bill (and do) a filling instead. Never do a permanent crown at 276 bucks total reimbursement when you can get 150 for a stainless steel crown, no impression or return visit. Lab costs are 100 on the permanent crown, and only 5 bucks on SSC and then no risk that historically unpredictable medicaid patients won’t come back to have the final permanent crown seated. I could cut costs by sending the perm crown to china…29 bucks, god only knows what they put in the crown.

      For those that don’t know, you don’t get paid unless you seat the final crown, and medicaid patients fail at least 50% of their appointments even if you confirm 10 day, 2 day, 1 day, 1 hr, and 1 minute ahead of time. Hard to remember appointments apparently. So if you do a permanent crown, not only do you barely cover your lab and other hard costs, you can only seat half your crowns due to compliance, so you really get screwed if you like doing decent quality work. Also crowns don’t fit very well due to tooth shifting after 1-2 years when the patient finally waltzes back into the office and expects their permanent crown to fit even though the temporary has been off for the last 6 months. (teeth shift a lot and quickly when there is no temporary on)

      Now fillings: 2 surface composites pay MORE than 3 surface posterior fillings. Why would anyone do a 3 surface? for the life of me, I can’t figure it out. Perhaps medicaid could explain it to me.

      Extractions: you have a kid in your chair in tears from bombed out permanent tooth. As a provider you are caught in the horrible position of either 1: doing the extraction whether or not medicaid pays or not. They will then usually deny the claim because it wasn’t preauthorized and then you just did free work. 2: you let the kid leave in tears while your biller preauthorizes a 96 dollar surgical extraction (normal office fee that EVERY ADULT PAYS for this same service is around 290.00, so the government is getting a heck of a deal anyways, and I don’t get paid for the pain of doing the preauthorization). Alternatively I could do an extraction and bill a lower code…d7140 and get 30 bucks. At least enough to cover the anesthetic and the room setup etc. So 90% off my standard rate. Lovely choices.

      They refuse to provide a number where a doctor can call a doctor directly for emergency authorizations. Probably too expensive for them (medicaid).

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search the TDMR Website

Most Viewed Posts & Pages

  • UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
    UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Judge Orders Dr. Richard Malouf to Pay Texas Back $12 Million for Medicaid Fraud
    Judge Orders Dr. Richard Malouf to Pay Texas Back $12 Million for Medicaid Fraud
  • MB2 Dental Solutions Issues Statement About $8.45 Million Settlement
    MB2 Dental Solutions Issues Statement About $8.45 Million Settlement
  • TDMR DMO Survey 2018 Results: MCNA Improves, DentaQuest Has More Problems, Dentists Frustrated
    TDMR DMO Survey 2018 Results: MCNA Improves, DentaQuest Has More Problems, Dentists Frustrated
  • Xerox/Conduent Settling Its $2 Billion Dental Medicaid Fraud Case with Texas?
    Xerox/Conduent Settling Its $2 Billion Dental Medicaid Fraud Case with Texas?

Receive Updates on TDMR Activities

Recent Comments by Readers

  • Spence on Woman claims dentist pulled wrong tooth
  • Spence on Woman claims dentist pulled wrong tooth
  • Nilar Vargas on Dentists cleared to administer COVID-19 vaccine in California
  • TDMR on UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Angela on UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Marjaneh on UPDATE: Dentists Clarified as Healthcare Workers to Receive COVID-19 Vaccines

Recent Media of Interest

AG Pax­ton: OAG Recov­ered $1.2 Bil­lion for Texas Taxpayers

January 23, 2021

2 defendants plead guilty in $109M Medicare fraud case

January 22, 2021

Allstate Hospice Founders Settle Fraud Case for $1.8 Million

January 21, 2021

No pardon for Texas attorney general in last-minute list

January 20, 2021

Woman claims dentist pulled wrong tooth

January 16, 2021

Compounding Pharmacy Mogul Sentenced for Multimillion-Dollar Health Care Fraud Scheme

January 16, 2021

Man Charged with $5 Million COVID-Relief Fraud

January 16, 2021

Justice Department Recovers Over $2.2 Billion from False Claims Act Cases in Fiscal Year 2020

January 14, 2021

Longview clinic agrees to pay more than $330,000 in Medicare fraud case

January 12, 2021

Texas legislature opens amid ongoing pandemic, political unrest

January 12, 2021

Latest TSDBE Newsletter

January 11, 2021

Dental workers anxiously wait for COVID-19 vaccine

January 8, 2021

Dentists cleared to administer COVID-19 vaccine in California

January 6, 2021

Stanford Healthcare Loses in Appeals Court, Accused of Alleged $468 Million Dollar Healthcare Billing Fraud

January 5, 2021

CEO of inpatient treatment center admits to Medicaid billing fraud

January 5, 2021

Despite what dentists may be hearing, now is a great time to buy a practice

January 4, 2021

More Articles...

Copyright © 2021 · All Rights Reserved. Texas Dentists for Medicaid Reform · Privacy Policy